                             -*- text -*-

This file documents what users should expect from path-based authz,
and the responsibilities of the implementor of said feature.


============================================================================
WHAT USERS SHOULD EXPECT FROM PATH-BASED AUTHZ
============================================================================

1. CHECKOUTS

   Unreadable paths will not be downloaded into a working copy.
   However, 'svn update' may cause working paths to disappear or
   re-appear based on changing server authorization policies.
   
   (Note: the .svn/entries file may still leak the name of the
   unreadable path; see the 'Known Leakage' section below.)


2. LOG MESSAGES

   Log information may be restricted, based on readability of
   changed-paths.
   
     * If the target of 'svn log' wanders into unreadable territory,
       then log output will simply stop at the last readable revision.
       The target will appear to be added (without history) in that
       revision.
   
     * If a revision returned by 'svn log' contains a mixture of
       readable/unreadable changed-paths, then the log message is
       suppressed, along with the unreadable changed-paths.  Only the
       revision number, author, date, and readable paths are
       displayed.
   
     * If a revision returned by 'svn log' contains only unreadable
       changed-paths, then only the revision number is displayed.
   
   It's an official recommendation ("best practice") to avoid the
   "mixed" changed-path situation; users should avoid making a single
   commit that includes changes to files in both readable and
   unreadable areas.  This scenario is quite annoying for people who
   can't read all the changed-paths.


3. COPIES (BRANCHING AND TAGGING)

   Subversion does O(1) copies of entire trees, but unfortunately,
   this isn't completely compatible with path-based access control.
   In order to copy an entire tree, every path in the tree must be
   checked for readability: this is an O(N) operation.
   
   Depending on the specific path-based authz module being used,
   however, there are sometimes solutions that aren't quite so
   expensive as O(N).


4. TRACING PATH CHANGES

   If a Subversion 1.1 client attempts to fetch an older version of a
   file or directory, e.g.:
   
       svn cat -r5 foo.c
       svn diff -r10:28 bar.c
   
   ...then there is a potential for failure, should older versions of
   the file exist at unreadable paths.  In other words, the tracing of
   copies/renames is subject to readabliity checks.
   
   If history-tracing wanders into unreadable territory, the process
   halts; no further information is retrieved.
   
      Example 1: while 'bar.c' might be perfectly readable in both
      revisions 5 and 20, the 'svn diff' command (above) will return
      error if the file has an unreadable ancestor somewhere between
      those two revisions.
   
      Example 2: 'svn blame bar.c' will not be able to retrieve
      unauthorized versions of a file, or any ancestors that precede
      it.  So it will appear that 'bar.c' was wholly added -- without
      history -- in the first public version *after* the unreadable
      version.
   
   So again, an official recommendation ("best practice") is to avoid
   renaming or copying files between public and private areas.  For
   users without omnipotent read permissions, this will make renames
   difficult to follow, and client commands which attempt to trace
   history are likely to fail.


5. REVISION PROPERTIES

   Users are allowed to attach arbitrary, unversioned properties to
   revisions.  Additionally, most revisions also have "standard"
   revision props (revprops), such as svn:author, svn:date, and
   svn:log.  Access to revprops may be restricted, based on
   readability of changed-paths.
   
     * If a revision contains nothing but unreadable changed-paths,
       then all revprops are unreadable and unwritable.
   
     * If a revision has a mixture of readable/unreadable
       changed-paths, then all revprops are unreadable, except for
       svn:author and svn:date.  All revprops are unwritable.
   
   It's an official recommendation ("best practice") to avoid the
   latter situation; users should avoid making a single commit that
   includes changes to files in both readable and unreadable areas.
   This situation is quite annoying for people who can't read all the
   changed-paths.


6. KNOWN LEAKAGE OF UNREADABLE PATHS

   Subversion may (occasionally) leak knowledge of the existence of an
   unreadable path.  However, the *contents* of an unreadable file or
   directory will never be leaked.
   
   Here are the known times when this happens:
   
     * 'svn ls directory-URL': an unreadable directory entry is still
       listed along with other entries.
   
     * 'svn checkout/update': an unreadable child doesn't appear in
       the working copy, but the .svn/entries file still contains an
       entry for it (marked 'absent').


============================================================================
HOW TO IMPLEMENT PATH-BASED AUTHZ
============================================================================

If an RA server implementation wants to implement path-based authz,
here are its responsibilities:

   1. Implement a read-authz callback (see svn_repos_authz_read_func_t), 
      and pass it to the following svn_repos.h functions:
   
           svn_repos_dir_delta()
           svn_repos_get_logs2()
           svn_repos_trace_node_locations()
           svn_repos_get_file_revs()
           svn_repos_rev_prop()
           svn_repos_rev_proplist()
   
   2. Manually implement read-authz for incoming network requests that
      represent calls to:
   
           RA->get_file()
           RA->get_dir()
           RA->check_path()
   
      (These concepts aren't wrapped by libsvn_repos becauseit's just
      as easy to call an authz func directly on a single path, rather
      than pass it to a repos wrapper.)
   
   3. Manually implement authz when receiving network requests that
      represent calls to a commit editor:
   
          - do write checks for most editor operations
          - do read *and* write checks for copy operations.
   
      (Note that doing full-out authz on whole trees fundamentally
      contradicts Subversion's O(1) copy philosophy; in practice,
      however, specific authz implementaitons are able get the same
      effect while being less expensive than O(N).)
